On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:04:35PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2007 2:51 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am playing with an idea to use nose instead of py.test. > > > > http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/ > > Actually, this is the homepage now: > > http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/ > > Only distributed testing is missing: > > http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/detail?id=93 > > So maybe we should stick to py.test for now. I need to implement the > "bisect" algorithm somewhere, either in py.test, or nose.
I think I'm +0 Basically if we could run tests with both py.test and nose it would be good. The profile plugin in nose seems to be intresting for me, since I don't know how to gather profile information from tests with py.test. This plugin should be adapted to cProfile though since hotshot postprocessing time is huge. (This task is easy) BTW: I've created nose mercurial mirror: http://landau.phys.spbu.ru/~kirr/cgi-bin/hg.cgi/nose--hg/ -- Всего хорошего, Кирилл. http://landau.phys.spbu.ru/~kirr/aiv/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
