On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:09 PM, henrik johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> >> Indeed. Could you please prepare a patch? We'll merge it. >> >> Right. That's why we should allow the user to pass his own simplifying >> functions. I think there will always be cases when simplify cannot do >> it, so that when the user can pass it's own zero finder, he can fix >> that easily. And let's report all failing cases as bugs to simplify. >> We'll then judge on case by case basis if simplify should handle it or >> not and how it should be approached. > > > Here is a patch with an optional zero finder function argument in the inv > method plus a note about the pivoting problem in the docstring. What do you > think?
Very nice patch, thanks! It's in: http://hg.sympy.org/sympy/rev/5fc85c34d2ae Welcome to our team: http://hg.sympy.org/sympy/rev/dbb9f31ff099 > And I will add issues for the cases where simplify fails to detect a zero > that I found so far. Excellent, thanks a lot! Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
