On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Aaron S. Meurer<[email protected]> wrote: > > Great. I guess the first thing would be to merge in the parallel > testing. Do you think that what we hacked up works well enough, or > does it need more refining? Otherwise, we should add it as an option, > as in ./bin/test --parallel or ./setup.py test --parallel.
Yes, we should do that. I think it's good enough, we just need to hook it in, e.g. write some better error reporting --- e.g. wait until stuff is done (I don't know if there is any way to report progress) and then maybe use our current reporting output. > > Also, do you think it is worth it to run doctests in parallel? Some > of them (mostly integrals) are slow. Do ./bin/doctest -v to see what > I mean. Yes, I think it is worthy. But first I would get the regular testing done. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
