On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Brian Granger <[email protected]> wrote: > I propose renaming .evalf() -> .N().
-1. First, it would break existing code. Second, I see the point in having both. First, evalf is what Maple calls it while N is what Mathematica calls it. So, it's handy for people switching. Since I'm a Maple user, I'd argue for evalf replacing N if that was the case. However, I think eliminating one is a bad idea. Cheers, Tim. --- Tim Lahey PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering University of Waterloo http://www.linkedin.com/in/timlahey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
