On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:

> On 03-19-2011, at 1:29 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yes, I think it should.  I would put such a project—one that removes the old 
>> assumptions and replaces them with the new—as top priority for SymPy, 
>> because there are so many things (like the Cython core) that are blocked on 
>> it, not to mention the fact that the new assumptions have the potential to 
>> be vastly superior to the old ones.
>> 
> 
> If I were to do a project on the assumptions, I'd probably need a fair bit of 
> assistance since I don't know really know the topic. However, I'm fairly good 
> a theory, so pointers to appropriate books/papers would be a good start if I 
> did that.

Well, if you don't feel comfortable doing that project, don't feel pressured 
into doing it.  I think the plotting idea is also something that is pretty 
important for SymPy.

> 
>>> 
>>> As an alternate project, I was thinking about plotting. What back ends do 
>>> people want? I'm guessing pyglet and matplotlib, but what else? I think 
>>> ASCII art would be a bit tricky since you'd have to develop a whole new 
>>> plotting back end rather than just interfacing with one.
>> 
>> I think those are the most important.  ASCII art would be cool, but probably 
>> too much work if a library doesn't already exist, and also less useful 
>> nowadays when most systems have a windowing system (I think Maple's ASCII 
>> art plots date back to the days when this was not the case).  Also, you 
>> should look at integrating it well with IPython's new QT console (Brian 
>> Granger can tell you more about this).  
>> 
>> What really needs to be done is to create a good system that lets you plug 
>> in any (Python) plotting system with minimal work.  
>> 
> 
> That's certainly what I'd like to see as well.
> 
>> By the way, you should be aware that we require all applicants to submit at 
>> least one patch that is reviewed and pushed in.  I didn't see your name in 
>> the git log, so you should do this.
> 
> I've done work related to Sage before. I'm looking through the issues 
> tracker.  
> 
> I have code to do Euler-Lagrange equations that I wrote in Maple that should 
> be fairly simple to add to sympy, if people are interested.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.

Yes, I remember you posting your Maple code on the list a while back.  I think 
many people would indeed find that useful.

Aaron Meurer

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to