Hello, Mateusz. > Can you tell us more about what didn't work or worked not the way you > expected it to work?
I'll firstly looked at unittests of simplification and saw, that ratsimp() often fails. For example http://pastebin.com/yeuBa7R7 (but my improvement isn't ideal too). Also i didn't noticed yet, but at #sympy i was told, that thrigonometrical simplification is weak too. > Do you plan to only extend simplify() to support more classes of functions > and rewrite rules, or you would like to implemented complexity measures and > make this function a decision procedure for minimization of symbolic > expressions (or both)? Maybe there are other areas of expression > simplification you would like to explore, e.g. context based > simplification, preservation of initial structure of expressions, etc. > Well, i haven't decided yet about descriptive plan of work. I can say that i want to improve sympy as much as i can. But i'll start working on quality of expressions simplification, and when i'll be satisfied, i'll pass to functional expanding. > What problems do you solve (or plan to solve) employing symbolic > computations? Maybe you can share some practical examples where SymPy can > be used. > My masters theme is about algorithms, not about appliance. But if i find such examples, i'll share. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
