Hi Christian, >> >> > remaining and it was unbearably slow for complex calculations, what's >> >> > your plan for that? >> >> >> >> As Christian remarked, it was slower if the caching was turned down. >> >> Caching is another problem, that needs to be addressed, as Christian >> >> remarked. My plan is that preferably the cache should be off by >> >> default, and/or flushing it the way Christian did it. If I remember >> >> well, it was not slower. >> > >> > Well, turning off the cache slows sympy so much that it's not a >> > realistic option at the moment. >> >> I disagree, as explained in the previous paragraph --- I don't think >> it was slower to use Christian's approach. Also, I know that the core > > Sympy is most certainly much slower in your branch than in master with > cache on. Just try "bin/test sympy/solvers" in both.
In your branch, is it really true that it is so much slower as Ronan is trying to say? I want to clear this issue up first, before replying to him. Ronan's emails are full of negative things, half of them are not true. He is stopping any development by his attitude. So I just want to reply very clearly and right to the point. He was the one, who caused to halt your work last summer in this area, and I am still pissed because of this. So my plan is to show on couple examples that he is wrong, and then politely ask him not to react negatively with regards to assumptions anymore and let us do our job. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
