As I pointed out in the other thread, non-commutative differentiation
already works in SymPy, so doing this should not be difficult.

Aaron Meurer

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Amit <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not familiar with the internals of sympy. But I suggest that if
> you start working on the implementation of symbolic matrices, you
> should take into consideration more complicated operators like
> differentiation.
> 'The Matrix Cookbook' has many matrix equalities that maybe can be
> implemented using some kind of pattern recognition.
>
> Amit
>
> On Jun 28, 8:16 pm, Matthew Rocklin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @Brian - Thanks for the heads up Brian. I'll see what I can do with option
>> (1). My short term solution was to start a "matrixify" function a la
>> sympify. It would probably be too annoying to use everywhere though.
>>
>> @Vinzent - Where is a good place to start learning about the new assumption
>> system (or the old one... I'm not up to speed on these)
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Vinzent Steinberg <
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Jun 28, 4:32 am, Matthew Rocklin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Yeah, definitely. I must confess that a hidden passion of mine is
>> > optimizing
>> > > linear algebra (we all have our quirks). I was just looking at Theano a
>> > > minute ago actually - I think it would be cool to easily dump Matrix
>> > > expressions onto them.
>>
>> > > How should matrix expressions be represented in SymPy though? The way I
>> > see
>> > > it there are three options
>>
>> > >    1. Leave it as a SymPy Expr, forget shape, transpose, rank, etc... for
>> > >    now. Maybe future SymPy elegance will make clever things possible
>> > (such as
>> > >    issue 1941)
>> > >    2. Enhance SymPy Expr's to play nice with Matrices
>> > >    3. Subclass a family of MatrixExpr classes that live outside the core
>>
>> > > Probably there are things I'm missing but this is how I separate things.
>> > > Because I'd like this done sooner rather than later I'm obviously in
>> > favor
>> > > of 2 or 3 with a preference for 3. I don't know enough about SymPy
>> > however
>> > > to tell whether this is the "right way" and I'd rather not work on
>> > something
>> > > unless it has a chance at getting in.
>>
>> > > I'll push again for three by saying that there is a lot going on in
>> > Matrix
>> > > Expressions other than just non-commutativity and shape. Inverses,
>> > > transposes, rank, symmetry, positive_definiteness, conditioning, etc...
>> > all
>> > > play a big role in computational decisions made on matrices. Additionally
>> > > matrix expressions are ubiquitous and important in the scientific
>> > computing
>> > > world. From my (strongly biased) perspective they deserve special
>> > > treatment.
>>
>> > I think all this '.is_*' stuff should rather be implemented using the
>> > new assumption system (not sure about shape, maybe this should really
>> > go into the core). If we use noncommutative symbols, I think we can
>> > avoid messing around with Mul and friends.
>>
>> > A.T could be implemented as a unary function.
>>
>> > Vinzent
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "sympy" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to