Hi all,
A few days back I implemented a bunch of combinatorial generation
algorithms for rather specialized objects (necklaces, lyndon words,
bell permutations). These were being reviewed by Chris Smith and he
pointed out that such algorithms may be unnecessary and he also wanted
to know the motivation for implementing them. I did not really have an
answer because honestly I was doing it for the kicks. My only argument
was that it was educative as these algorithms have been developed
within the last decade and a graduate student studying combinatorics
might find it useful. For now, I have not submitted the code I wrote
for the more specialized objects because it is outside of the scope of
my proposal and I am a bit behind on my Permutation groups
implementation (which I believe is the real meat of my project). I
would still like to know what the rest of you think about this issue.
Regards
Saptarshi Mandal

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to