You can wrap the functions, if they can compute exact values. For example, this is what we ended up doing with euler(). In general, mpmath will implement efficient algorithms for these functions, so this can be a good idea. And it will still be useful to have symbolic forms of the functions.
Aaron Meurer On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Srinivas Vasudevan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have another question. I looked into the mpmath module, and saw that there > were several q-analogs of combinatorial functions implemented. My question > is that should there be a wrapper class in the combinatorial functions for > these q-analogs, or should they be left as is. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
