On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps both should be "constantsimp" and the behavior should be > controlled by a keyword argument. > > On the other hand, you could argue that your model function is only > superficially similar to constantsimp, in that it calls constantsimp() > after putting in the constants. I can't really think of a better name > for it, though, other than my suggestion above.
It doesn't even do that anymore...there were too many difficulties in trying to get a generic equation in order to be processed by constantsimp. It's a stand alone function. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
