On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Andy Ray Terrel <[email protected]> wrote: > Toon put in the basic generator (fcode) and Oyvind worked on doing the > fuller generator but I don't think it was finished. We should > probably have a F95CodeGen and F77CodeGen to separate out the major > differences, but I'm not a Fortran guy so I didn't pay attention to > the minutia when it was built.
Exactly, I wasn't a Fortran guy either, but I am now. :) Currently the generated code is a mixture of f77 and f90 (or later), so I think that the f77 solver should simply generate raw functions as it codegen does now for (with the f95 interface as it does now, I think that makes sense). The f90/95 should simply create a Fortran module and that's it. I am still new to Fortran though (started last February), so if there is some experience Fortran programmer around, I'll be happy to learn how to do this properly. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
