I'm wrong, it's used and the tests show why one would want this, but the lack of docstring makes it hard to understand. Shouldn't this be mentioned at least in lambdify with some examples?
On 10 November 2011 16:01, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > While trying to wrap my head around lambdify I have found this commit: > > commit bbddfc4e479f3387a5d839c237459c6f9578d4d3 > Author: Andrew Straw <[email protected]> > Date: Sat Jan 17 14:38:34 2009 -0800 > > DeferredVector implementation, allowing lambdification using arbitrary > vectors > > sympy/matrices/__init__.py | 2 +- > sympy/matrices/matrices.py | 11 +++++++++++ > sympy/printing/str.py | 3 +++ > sympy/test_external/test_numpy.py | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > grep 'DeferredVector' -ir sympy/* > sympy/external/tests/test_numpy.py: X=sympy.DeferredVector('X') > sympy/matrices/matrices.py:class DeferredVector(object): > sympy/matrices/__init__.py: list2numpy, matrix2numpy, DeferredVector, > block_diag, symarray, ShapeError, > sympy/printing/str.py: def _print_DeferredVector(self, expr): > sympy/printing/codeprinter.py: _print_DeferredVector = > _print_not_supported > > > It seems it's completely unused. Should this be removed? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
