I don't think there's much that's heavily algorithmic involved. It just involves restructuring the classes in one of the two ways I suggested in the issue.
I think most of our contributions come from people who have not studied complex computer algebra algorithms. They, like you, are users of SymPy who wanted some feature or found some bug. The majority of things do not require much more knowledge than Python programming and the math behind whatever you are working with. For this, the math is trivial, and your code from issue 2960 is enough to convince me that you know enough Python. And if you have questions with the SymPy internals, we will happily answer them. Aaron Meurer On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Kevin Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: Heh, I appreciate your apparent faith in my coding skill. I'll take the suggestion under advisement, but I'm more of an optimization feller than I am an algebraic wiz. There would be a lot of learning I'd have to do of the Sympy internals ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/7URonPtQuAQJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
