> > I'm not sure that IEEE is a good source for SymPy. IEEE's primary focus is > numerics, SymPy is about symbolics. > So while IEEE is definitely a good source of hints, we should check > whether the reasoning behind each still holds in a symbolic context. > > This is one of those borderline cases and Aaron said to go with the IEEE (as I suppose that will avoid confusion between how Floats and floats behave). That's good enough for me for now. So we get both nan**0 and 1**nan consistent and if we decide we don't like it it can be changed later. All tests at present pass with the changes I've made.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
