Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 08:20 -0600, Matthew Rocklin a écrit :
>         I've guessed that reading the code. Would it be hard for me to
>         implement the missing MatPow function ?
>  
> It should be easy to implement such a class. I would suggest the name
> MatExponential. We already have a MatPow for the case A**b (A a
> matrix, b a scalar). I would suggest looking at MatPow and MatMul as
> examples. You'll also have to change the __rpow__ operator in MatExpr
> (look at the surrounding functions to see what to do). This should
> allow for the syntax e**A but not exp(A).

x**A is a confusing notation and is very rarely used with x != E. We
should only have exp(A).



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to