On Mar 8, 11:53 pm, Sergiu Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Abhiram Ampabathina
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > First take a look at
> > this:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8pXy4LH0sF0Z2RUZGhaZ2NTaEN1NjdYc1lId...
> > Second
> > look:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8pXy4LH0sF0Y2Q5Ym1USWVRbUdnczNzcGE0M...
>
> I still think that it is not very useful to force the user to input
> the arguments to a function in this way. As I said, it is very
> inflexible. You do provide a way to run some combinations of
> functions, but I feel like this is less intuitive than actually typing
> some expressions into a SymPy console.
>
> I think Aaron's suggestion is a very nice starting point. You may
> want to build on that idea.
>
> Sergiu
Hello Sergiu,
I understand that the idea of way of testing the code
is
not liked much. Yeah that may become less intuitive than typing, but
the way i thought it would be is, we shall list each and every use of
a
particular function, all combinations of different functions, if
users
would like to know the result of those combinations, they may check
on that particular combination and try experimenting on different
values to test. When users select a particular module to study, we
could list
all the modules relating to it, using it, different interpretations
used, where else it is used in and etc., . I think that might be
sufficient to explore various ways of a module. That was the thought
i
got. Yeah, the idea of "linking to that particular documentation" is
interesting. How would you like to have the testing mechanism at the
GUI? Give your ways.
Apart from this, We could have few more things
1. Give a voice over narration for the Practical Guide.
2. Make it into like a complete practical guide like thing
> Give notes
> Give Examples
> Allow them test the function
> And give them a short exercise on the
previous module(users may skip if they doesn't like to)
Relational Functionality: Never mind. I meant combining different
functions(the relations between the function)
I agree that the screen shots did not satisfy you. Lemme make it more
legible and neat. I will come with a good one this time. It's gonna
take time i guess.
Regards,
Abhiram
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
