I think it would be best if sympify() were to remain a strict Python to SymPy parser. In this respect, there are very few things that it cannot do yet (the two that I can think of are http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2663 and http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3051).
Aaron Meurer On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Sergiu Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The idea behind sympify is not to be a parser for everything that a >> user can enter. Work done on gamma.sympy is more related to the other >> parsers that can be found in sympy. > > Yes, sure, I understand that the scope of sympify() is more specific. > However, the format of expressions accepted by sympify() should also > be accepted by Gamma, which makes enhancing sympify() strongly related > to enhancing Gamma (at least in the aspect of handling inputs in a > syntax similar to Python). > > Sergiu > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
