On Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:03:07 PM UTC+5:30, Stefan Krastanov wrote: > > > The initial block is going to be huge. The block is recursively > subdivided > > and evaluated. If I have a false positive on one of the big blocks, the > plot > > will be outright wrong. One thing we can do is to break down the whole > > region > > into a grid and assume that the function is monotonic in each cell and > > evaluate the expression. I think this will be the best solution to such > > functions. > > I suppose this is the problem that I was unable to see. Nonetheless, > the solution you propose seems interesting. > One other thing - using `fill_between` will work for the big blocks > but it will fail for the smaller ones. If you will be working on > pixels you may want to check `showimage`. Another thing that may be > better than fill_between is to use directly the polygon collection > class. I don't know a good way to do this for the vector formats > (svgfig). > Thanks again for helping me in making my ideas clear. Discussions with you really helped me understand the Jeff Tupper's ideas better and I think I will be able to negotiate a lots of pitfalls due to these discussions. I will look into polygon collection class and the `showimage` function. Thanks again.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/SjpVUmhTwLoJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
