Tom, I think I understand your points, but I'd still like to ask you whether you find it acceptable to have the classes I have suggested in SymPy?
To be honest I don't really care (other than that, most of the time, new code in sympy is good news). Don't get me wrong, I'm really interested in ring theory in sympy, in fact I'm working on getting something started [1] [2]. But if your proposal is basically to change the class hierarchy *above* the current Ring class, then that's not really going to affect me, is it? As I have tried say time and again, neither will it affect your code as far as I can tell, but if you want to spend time and energy on discussing and then implementing some sort of abstract framework, be my guest.
[1] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1190 [2] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1199 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
