I see yes the specific case is a somewhat different story. Regardless it does make sense to map & to And and | to OR? As an alternative is there any nice way to override the behavior of & and | in sympy?
Thanks, Rob On May 2, 3:09 pm, Joachim Durchholz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 02.05.2012 16:42, schrieb Robert: > > >http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3105&q=%7C&sort=-id&c... > > > the ticket seems to mention that And doesn't do anything meaningful. > > No, Ronan says that a specific use case does not work as we'd like it to. > In this case, the problem is that boolean values, boolean simplification > and assumptions all have overlaps, and it's not clear how the system > should work in general. We know a lot of things that aren't quite right, > but we don't know for sure how a correct solution should work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
