Le samedi 19 mai 2012 à 17:53 +0200, [email protected] a écrit : > Thanks, this discussion made many of the dark corners of sympy a bit > less frightening for me. I will try to play around with some of the > ideas/changes that were mentioned. > > Getting back to the issue from the first message: making Expr > recursively callable. I suppose that the way to see if we need to > revert the change is to see how well (1+f)(x) will work and whether it > was worth it. My gsoc branch may show some nice examples. We will > see... > I'd really like to see what the point of this is, because, for now, I'm only seeing the complications caused by all the special cases and the possibilities for unexpected interactions.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
