On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 3:10 PM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Most of you know that for some time I am running a quick and ugly
> automated version of sympy-bot that checks the pull requests (not
> master) for changes and runs the tests. Any recommendations/complaints
> are welcomed. Especially if somebody wants to make a real automated
> runner with all the magic that was done with tox, etc... (However as
> it is "quick and dirty" I will probably not spend much time on it)
>
> I am writing just to mention that it will now run the tests on
> 2.5(without other modules), 3.2(without other modules) and 2.7(with
> numpy and matplotlib). Hopefully it will be useful and it will not
> irritate anybody. I suppose that when the bugs in 3.3 are fixed I will
> run it on 3.3 instead of 3.2.

Great, that sounds like the three most useful combinations.  My only
suggestion would be to make one of the Python 2 tests run in 32-bit
and the other in 64-bit, so we can catch any issues related to that
(though the hash randomization from 3.3 will likely catch any such
issues first).

Also, if you could additionally install gmpy in Python 2.7, that would
be useful as well.

Aaron Meurer

>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to