On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > There was a comment about the need of separate latex viewer. I was not > sure what was meant by that.
I guess the comment was about the fact that one still has to use something besides a Unicode terminal to have LaTeX working. > Thus, just so we are clear on this, > ipython qtconsole and ipython notebook (which are part of the standard > installation of python) support seamless latex printing. You enter > `integrate(blah blah)` and the output that you see is not the latex > code, but the already the nicely compiled images (how much of the > image is a raster blob and how much is editable is a magic that I was > not interested in). Anyway, this is why I said that getting fancier > pretty_printing does not seem very important. I haven't tried IPython notebooks on my own computer, but do I understand it right that it's something similar to what one sees on live.sympy.org and www.sagenb.org? Those are cool things and I agree that, having them, pretty printing on the console is becoming considerably less important. (Slightly like ASCII plots vs. graphical plots.) Sergiu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
