Yes, that's true, I choose to trust the RNGs :) I'm concerned with testing if the actual algorithms use the random numbers in the right way. But it seems that we've reached some consensus on that. Anyway, what do you guys think about the concerns I pointed out in my previous post though?
14 юни 2012, четвъртък, 20:52:04 UTC+3, Joachim Durchholz написа: > > Am 14.06.2012 09:38, schrieb Chris Smith: > > I copied the dot-dot link on the google search page. Try this: > > > http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-22-rev1a/SP800-22rev1a.pdf > > That's related to testing RNGs. > I think Aleksandar was asking about texting code that uses RNGs. > (Yes, there's some overlap, but most issues are unique to each field.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/ubgSOdxszQsJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
