On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Rocklin <[email protected]> wrote: > Generally speaking graph visualization of trees/dags is much more reasonable > than for general graphs. I.e. the dot program is far more reliable than the > neato program for layout when you can use it. > > I made a small program that does this here > https://gist.github.com/3332164 > > It produces results like what are found here > http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~mrocklin/tempspace/sympy-graphs/ > > You're right that SymPy all at once is difficult to take in. SymPy/core on > the other hand is very manageable. Each of the individual modules also come > out nicely (see geometry, matrices) > > Note that I haven't applied any style to these graphs. There is a lot we > could do to clarify things by playing with node size, edge length, spring > stiffness, etc.... > > Anyway, I encourage people to take a look. I suspect that by looking at the > class structure as a whole we can find some organizational improvements.
Wow - very nice graphs for such a small amount of code. > > Best, > -Matt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
