OK, thanks for all the suggestions. I think for now in the interest of time I plan to look at what Sean had suggested. Will post back an update on this sometime soon.
-Guru On Saturday, August 18, 2012 9:50:01 PM UTC-5, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > I created http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3366 for the > DummyFunction. I guess what you want perhaps is doable, but even the > physics or diff geom stuff will either be hacks, or limited. We > really should have support for arbitrary operators on functions in the > core of SymPy. > > Also, users shouldn't have to know physics or differential geometry to use > it. > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > However the commutator in the diffgeom module is between differential > > operators. It is not exactly what you ask for. Actually I do not > > understand how "x" acts on anything in your example as it is not a > > differential operator (it can be regarded as a hermitian operator as > > in quantum mechanics "acting" simply by multiplication, however this > > requires to much magic for the moment) > > IMHO, this should be represented as x*Id, even with core operator > support. Ambiguous notation is nice for hand written stuff, but it's > better to use completely unambiguous notation when using a computer > algebra system. > > Aaron Meurer > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/kvNkqw41kKgJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
