I'm on this topic again. Does anyone have any thoughts? On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Matthew Rocklin <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm interested in developing an assumptions system for matrices. This > would have predicates like symmetric, singular, orthogonal, etc.... > > I've looked through the current assumptions system (and a little bit > through pull 1162). From this I'm able to create matrix assumptions by > adding to the files in sympy/assumptions. I create a new directory for > matrix handlers (a la sets, ntheory, calculus) and I add new predicates to > Q in ask.py. > > This doesn't feel right though, I'm mixing two different assumption > systems into one set of files. For example Q now has two disjoint sets of > predicates. What is the right way to do things? Is there a clean way to > instantiate a new module specific assumptions system? > > -Matt > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
