I wouldn't do that. Then the behavior is completely different when the first letter comes before the second than when the first letter comes after the second one.
Aaron Meurer On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Does this make sense? > >>>> symbols('x:c') # or should it require a delimiter 'x\\:c' or 'x(:c)' > (xa, xb, xc) >>>> symbols('x:z') > (x, y, z) > > (Or should the first case give no symbols as it presently does?) > > In favor of using parentheses around ranges, they help to visually > make clear what is intended, e.g 'x(:c)', and they are consistent with > the use of redundant parentheses in expressions (logical or algebraic) > to make parsing more obvious. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
