> Of course, just as with wolfram, if the by hand algorithm can't do it but > risch or meijerg can, we would then just show the result without any options > to see how it is done step by step.
Yes, you show the point. However, I think that if we had *fast* algorithms for the "big" problems (Integration, Summation, Limits, Eqn-Solving, ...) then we should not apply heuristics anymore. But this is off-topic to the original question about making a good proposal for step by step evaluation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
