We are already trying to get it. Someone seems to be squatting the name. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool. I like where this is going. You might want to see if you can get > access to https://github.com/pydy somehow (or is that already you guys > who own that?). > > Aaron Meurer > > On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Gilbert Gede <[email protected]> wrote: > > I added a few more points to our entry on the Ideas page, and my name as a > mentor. > > We came up with a rough roadmap for PyDy (http://pydy.org/roadmap), and I > actually think there is enough work for a student's GSoC project that would > be entirely within SymPy. That being said though, at this point it would be > more beneficial (for both groups) to do some work on things outside the > SymPy codebase. There's quite a bit of work to go on bringing > physics.mechanics from where it is now to where it is accessible by "the > masses", which would increase visibility for SymPy. We should probably put > "Powered by SymPy", or something like that, on the PyDy page, and try and > show of some of SymPy's non-mechanics abilities within the PyDy examples. > > But for now (this year), I agree that work on PyDy could still be a SymPy > project. > > -Gilbert > > On Monday, 25 February 2013 12:31:54 UTC-8, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> >> On Feb 25, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Dale Lukas Peterson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> pydy.org gives a 404. You might want to fix that. >> > >> > I'm not sure why pydy.org was 404'ing, it is fine now. It is hosted >> > on a AWS t1.micro instance, so maybe it just got briefly overloaded. >> > >> >> You should also contact the SymPy list, as they will probably be the >> >> mentoring organization that you will apply to (unless you guys have >> >> some project that would live outside the SymPy code base, in which >> >> case, it can possibly also go under the umbrella of another project, >> >> such as Python). >> > >> > With regards to the mentoring organization, we are interested in >> > development of some things which are related to >> > sympy.physics.mechanics but are not symbolic in nature and as such >> > might not make sense to be part of sympy. Where the boundary is >> > exactly I am not certain, but I think the line is probably somewhere >> > near the point where sympy expressions get output as C code that is >> > then compiled to do some sort of numerical study. We have some ideas >> > of things we'd like to do be able to (in a generic sense) with this >> > numerical code, and it doesn't seem like this belongs in sympy. So we >> > were considering creating a project that depends on sympy and >> > specifcally sympy.physics.mechanics but isn't necessarily part of it. >> > This has code maintenance issues though, so we should verify that this >> > is absolutely necessary before we go this route. >> > >> > If people have thoughts on this, I would love to hear them. >> >> This is a great example of what Matthew suggested earlier on this list >> about using GSoC to support external projects that use SymPy. So even >> if most of the code doesn't directly go in SymPy, we could still >> consider "hosting" such a project. If it really is completely separate >> from SymPy (except for the inevitable bug fix patches to SymPy), you >> might want to have the student also apply to Python. Then they will >> have a better chance of being accepted regardless of how the slots >> work out. If you do decide to go this route, you should decide soon, >> as Python requires orgs that they umbrella to apply to them. >> >> Aaron Meurer >> >> > >> >> You should also read >> >> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2013-application-template. >> In >> >> particular, we require at least one patch to SymPy to be accepted. >> > >> > Definitely. >> > >> >> By the way, can you guys make sure that >> >> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2013-ideas is up-to-date >> with >> >> all the potential ideas for the mechanics module? >> > >> > I have added a few ideas related to the sympy.physics.mechancis to the >> > bottom of the GSoC-2013 ideas list. I have added my name to the list >> > of potential mentors and would be interested in mentoring something >> > related to common subexpression elimination or >> > sympy.physics.mechanics. >> > >> > Luke >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "sympy" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to [email protected]. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > >> > >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
