Thanks, Aaron. I put the following into LambdaPrinter, and it seems to be
doing the job nicely:
def _print_Mod(self,expr):
a=expr.args
retVal= "((%s)%%(%s))" % (self._print(a[0]),self._print(a[1]))
return retVal
On Monday, February 25, 2013 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be better to make it print using %. That would be universal,
> not just for Numpy (and it should therefore just be added to the
> LambdaPrinter).
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:53 AM, G B <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> wrote:
>
> I went and tried to lamdify an expression with a Mod operator using the
> "numpy" module, and it didn't like it. Is fixing this as easy as adding
> "Mod":"mod",
> to the NUMPY_TRANSLATIONS dictionary in utilities/lambdify.py?
>
> I just discovered lambdify, and now I can't stop using it for
> everything... I'd had my own implementation using a hacked together
> sequence of substitutions, solves and closures, but this is much more
> satisfying!
>
> Thanks--
> Greg
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
