@david: I knew about networkX library but was not aware about OpenOpt. My main aim to introduce Graph Theory into Sympy was to give give the users total freedom to apply Sympy's functions seamlessly onto the results of graph theory and vice versa. Instead of the graph class used by NetworkX, I'd be implementing all the functions on the matrix of the graph itself, so that there is an option for further computation on the graph. This is possible in NetworkX using interlinked conversions, but is a tedious and time consuming task. Moreover, I thought that a user will be more comfortable if he finds all the math-related functions in the same library(isn't that the motive behind creating a library), instead of importing different libraries. That was the main motive behind adding Graph Theory module. @brian: that is a brilliant idea, asking for GSoC under networkX. But due to familiarity with Sympy, I thought of asking here first. Moreover, NetworkX is integrated into Sage, which is another organisation already participating in GSoC. So can try there too. @aaron: Please get back if there is some thought of integrating graph theory into sympy in the future. Moreover, I completely Agree with you on my inappropiate thought of adding a numerical solver like that of optimization into a symbolic solver library.
Anyways, I'll start working on the improvement of your matrix module and prepare a proposal for that. Really appreciate all of your suggestions. Thanks. Regards, Rajat Kapoor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
