On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Brian Granger <[email protected]> wrote: > Extra bonus points if this stuff can be integrated with sympy.physics > or even better sympy.physics.quantum...otherwise we just keep creating > new corners of sympy that don't work together. I know it is easier, > but in the long run it is a horrible situation. The stuff in > sympy.physics.quantum is completely general and should be able to > handle all of this with some work. It would also be great to get > secondquant.py into sympy.physics.quantum so it doesn't reinvent the > wheel. It even has wicks theorem, which is the foundation of all > Feynman diagrams. Let's do this right!
Yes, that's one of the reasons why I didn't rush to put this into sympy yet, as it actually doesn't even use anything from sympy... But one advantage of putting such things into sympy.physics, even if it doesn't work together with the rest of sympy is that other people can maybe figure out how to get it working or how to generalize it. And my simple non-sympy code can then be used to test the generalized version. So now I think it is worth to put it there, write good docs + tests and other people can build upon it. So I'll try to polish it up and send a PR soon. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
