Thanks Mario! I really appreciate your help. That's quite amazing that they had few bugs in the algorithm. Do you think they didn't actually implement it in any software?
Ondrej On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:36 AM, mario <[email protected]> wrote: > The attached version works in the mentioned cases; the bug is fixed reducing > to the case ``A > 0, B > 0`` > > > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:28:22 AM UTC+2, Thilina Rathnayake wrote: >> >> I should try making input coefficients to be square free. I think the >> algorithm in general, >> does not work when the coefficients are not square free. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Thilina Rathnayake <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> We can add descent(23, 616) to the bug list too. It also return (None, >>> None, None) >>> but (6, 1, 38) is a solution. By finding more and more test cases which >>> fail, I think we can >>> identify a pattern and then the cause for the bug. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Thilina >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
