What is the class?  Another option would be to make the super-class
simpler.  My opinion is that .args should hold all relevant information and
other fields should compute their values from .args by properties.


On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 3:00 AM, F. B. <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am subclassing a class of sympy which has a complicated *args* structure,
> but the subclass has certain properties so that it automatically fills many
> of these *args*. In the constructor code of my subclass I add the missing
> args and then I call the superclass constructor, which records the args. I
> want that my subclass retains the property of rebuildability, but my class
> now has in its args a lot more variables than needed by the constructor.
>
> How can I deal with this? Should I overwrite the *func( )* method to
> handle more data than required by the constructor?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to