Janwillem, thanks for sending the script to the list.
That's the most efficient way to get things done.

Ondrej

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Janwillem van Dijk
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I would be very glad if that could be done. My little project is part of a
> discussion on uncertainty evaluation in radiation dose measurements. I try
> to convince my colleagues that the traditional method developed by Gauss in
> 1800 is not reliable in our field. The method of choice is Monte Carlo
> integration. So I want a script where the traditional (called LPU) functions
> look as much as possible to the Monte Carlo method (MCM) functions as
> possible. When starting this project I also tried the *-way but thought it
> ugly and not very convincing when comparing it with the numpy/scipy based
> MCM (and old people like me reminds it of pointers and crashing computers).
> So I was very glad discovering the numpy option in lambdify which worked as
> I understood it would. So again I would be very pleased to see it working
> with 3.3.
> For your info please find the problem scripts and some background in the
> attached archive (comments very welcome).
> Cheers, Janwillem
>
> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014 11:04:30 UTC+1, Janwillem van Dijk wrote:
>>
>> I have a SymPy script with a.o.
>>
>> f_mean = lambdify([mu, sigma], mean, modules='numpy')
>>
>>
>> where mean is a function of mu and sigma and mu and sigma are both arrays
>>
>> mu = symbols('mu_0:%d' % n, real=True, bounded=True)
>>
>> sigma = symbols('sigma_0:%d' % n, positive=True, real=True, bounded=True)
>>
>>
>> Under Python 2.7.5+ SymPy 0.12.0 I can use:
>>
>> y = f_mean(x_n, ux_n)
>>
>> returning y as a numpy array of size n when x_n and ux_n are both numpy
>> arrays of size n.
>>
>> However, with Python 3.3.2+ and SymPy 0.7.4.1-git I get (for n=5):
>>
>> y = f_mean(x_n, ux_n)
>> TypeError: <lambda>() missing 10 required positional arguments: 'mu_2',
>> 'mu_3', 'mu_4', 'mu_5', 'sigma_0', 'sigma_1', 'sigma_2', 'sigma_3',
>> 'sigma_4', and 'sigma_5'
>>
>>
>> Which is similar to what I got in Python 2.7 before I added the
>> modules=numpy argument
>>
>> All this on ubuntu 13.10
>>
>>
>> Have I missed something in the docs or did I stumble on a not yet
>> implemented feature?
>>
>> Any help very welcome.heers,
>>
>> Cheers, Janwillem
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to