If many unit tests assume that NaN == NaN, then I take that as a hint
that == is supposed to be object equality, not the numeric equality that
IEEE 754 defines.
I'm not 100% sure that I'm on track with that observation.
Whatever the exact semantics of == for NaN, I think it should be
documented in Nan's docstring to avoid exactly the irritation you
experienced.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
