Historically, the purpose of the 0 has not been features but API stability. That's my main motivation for waiting for the assumptions.
Aaron Meurer On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Joachim Durchholz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 14.03.2014 23:07, schrieb Aaron Meurer: > >> Honestly, in my view, the only reason that we should continue to keep >> the 0 in the front of the version number is the assumptions. Once we >> get that fixed, we should release SymPy 1.0. But what do I know. Maybe >> SymPy 1.0 should be released now, and when the assumptions get fixed >> it would be SymPy 2.0. > > > Switching to a rule-based engine would warrant another increment in the > major release number. > > From that perspective, a 1.x would be warranted right now already. It's just > that we didn't notice when SymPy became generally useful and had earned its > 1.0 release number. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/5323834C.7040604%40durchholz.org. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6KV9XqKhrDwMDbS9XcowHx9CFo-ZzC%2BWGgKbojttWYtiA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
