I have been working on a proposal to implement 3D plotting in SymPyGamma, and Jason pointed me to the importance of d3.js and Three.js backend in the Sympy itself. so, i want to discuss the idea.As only four days are left please reply. My motivation is https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sympy/plotting$20module/sympy/q3kOnJfRXdw/JAEL6AyJnZQJ by Stefan Krastanov . SymPyGamma's plotting is based on D3.js and does not used SymPy's plotting module which limits the plots that can be produced by Gamma BUT if i can implement a D3.js backend for 2D plotting and Three.js backend for 3D plotting in SymPy itself which can be directly used in Gamma as done by Stefan .here: http://blog.krastanov.org/2013/05/14/sympy-plots-with-d3-in-ipyhton will it be more beneficial than implementing Three.js in Gamma only? Also, the point about the python execution time limit on App engine we can use Ajax to separate the execution into multiple python executuion as suggested by Stefan in the discussion and also we can export the results as Gist and Query them which will reduce the execution time significantly, i have done significant work in my PR https://github.com/sympy/sympy_gamma/pull/32.
Please tell me is it any good? should i change my proposal? I can do this if everyone think that this is good! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/d2d0fc0b-187a-4a16-bf5b-d2ffdc6da826%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
