I can surely try to fix it! thakns for pointing that issue to us. On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:20:09 PM UTC+5:30, SAHIL SHEKHAWAT wrote: > > I have been working on a proposal to implement 3D plotting in SymPyGamma, > and Jason pointed me to the importance of d3.js and Three.js backend in > the Sympy itself. so, i want to discuss the idea.As only four days are left > please reply. > My motivation is > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sympy/plotting$20module/sympy/q3kOnJfRXdw/JAEL6AyJnZQJby > Stefan > Krastanov . SymPyGamma's plotting is based on D3.js and does not used > SymPy's plotting module which limits the plots that can be produced by > Gamma BUT if i can implement a D3.js backend for 2D plotting and Three.js > backend for 3D plotting in SymPy itself which can be directly used in Gamma > as done by Stefan .here: > http://blog.krastanov.org/2013/05/14/sympy-plots-with-d3-in-ipyhton will > it be more beneficial than implementing Three.js in Gamma only? > Also, the point about the python execution time limit on App engine we can > use Ajax to separate the execution into multiple python executuion as > suggested by Stefan in the discussion and also we can export the results as > Gist and Query them which will reduce the execution time significantly, i > have done significant work in my PR > https://github.com/sympy/sympy_gamma/pull/32. > > Please tell me is it any good? should i change my proposal? I can do this > if everyone think that this is good! >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/b1699c0f-4827-42f0-81bc-e25b00cfd016%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
