On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > I think evaluation is pretty straightforward. You just evaluate one > (like sin), and then the rest are easily defined in terms of it. I > like your approach. > > But what about the other things, like the series expansion or meijerg > table entries? And probably the biggest are the simplification rules
I think the series expansion can be unified too, it looks quite similar. > (e.g., for the Fu algorithm). And can we somehow get basically all of > the hyperbolic functions automatically from > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OsbornesRule.html? These two I don't know. We should look at some other software like Axiom, Maxima or Sage. > > I wouldn't block on this, though. If you want to add a missing > function or functionality, you can just do it the duplicating way, and > we can figure out how to remove the duplication later. Just make sure > the tests verify the mathematical correctness of the functions. Hopefully I'll have some time over the summer to do this. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVAUH-H8FmnHtdMWRsBVT7kmOM309Dea0Lpq3hGdE6fLQg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
