On Thursday, March 20, 2014 7:17:13 PM UTC+1, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>
> Hi Peter, 
>
> I read through your ideas. First of all, I started SymPy as a 
> theoretical physics student myself, 
> and I wanted to automate the General Relativity as well as high energy 
> QFT calculations. I am still 
> very interested in that, but there are a lot of tough problems and 
> parts that need to be in place. 
>
>
The rigorous math approach behind that is indeed tough. 

You need to be able to do integrals, handle potentially large 
> formulas, tensor manipulation and simplification 
> (e.g. gamma matrices), and so on. It's not easy at all, but we've done 
> a long progress since the time I started 
> SymPy in 2007 or so.


I had a proposal to view tensors as graphs, possibly using NetworkX to 
represent the tensor structure (cfr. the book by Cvitanovic)

The best way to get some ideas of what can be done is to look into 
> existing packages, they are pretty much 
> all in Mathematica. In fact, most theoretical physicist just use 
> Mathematica.


Many Mathematica packages make heavy usage of pattern dispatch, we don't 
have such advanced capabilities here in sympy. Mathematica code is 
generally not easily portable, but I wish there will be support for pattern 
dispatch in the future.


So it would be really nice to have the project that you describe. You 
> should have a look at work done by Francesco Bonazzi 
> regarding the gamma matrices: 
>
> https://github.com/Upabjojr 
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2601 
>
> He has lots of PRs, closed and open. It's nontrivial. And those are 
> just the gamma matrices. I think Francesco's goal 
> could be summarized by your proposal, and he's done many months worth 
> of work on it already. So the scope is just huge. 
>

Gamma matrices themselves are represented by a tensor, with one Lorentz 
index and two Dirac indices. Technically, calling it a tensor is a bit 
anomalous, as only the Lorentz index correspond to a tangent/cotangent 
bundle, while the Dirac indices correspond to the spinor bundle of the 
spacetime manifold.

In any case, we don't have to be exact about the underlying algebra, 
especially if it is far more complicated than what is really necessary for 
QFT and GR.

I once found a Mathematica library with a very simple code to reduce the 
products of gamma matrices. Indeed they made use of pattern dispatch. 
Without pattern dispatch, it becomes really complicated. I came to the 
conclusion that we really need a pattern dispatching mechanism, and one 
specially suited for SymPy tensors, otherwise all tensor manipulation code 
will end up being a total mess.

 

>
> One of the things is for example just the Feynman diagrams generator 
> for various Lagrangians. 


There are already open-source libraries doing this.
 

> I am sure there must be some 
> packages that do that, but it'd be nice to integrate this with SymPy 
> and create nice IPython Notebooks that generate all the correct 
> diagrams, for example from Peskin & Schroeder.


As for SymPy, I would rather focus on the mathematical structure of objects 
representing lagrangians. For example, Lagrangian densities cannot 
currently be represented by tensors, as there is no support for tensor 
derivative operators yet! What about enabling partial and functional 
derivatives on tensors? That can easily lead to algebraic criteria to 
derive the Feynman rules from Lagrangians.

This will be good for 
> pedagogical reasons, as well as computations. In general, 
> good applications in my opinion are providing automatic symbolic 
> solutions to various exercises from books. 
>
 
I guess that everyone hates doing QFT calculations by hand. 


> I would suggest you to figure out something, that can be finished 
> during a summer and that would provide something useful, 
> on it's own. So that you can create nice examples out of it. Then you 
> can continue working on some other things after the summer


I suggest that you consider the Lie group tensor representations as a 
possible project only if you have an almost perfect knowledge of the 
theory. It would be nice to link the tensor indices to the corresponding 
Lie group representations, but that requires a project on Lie groups first.

By the way, I hope you'll be able to submit your proposal and that your 
proposal will be accepted!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/67f5e77c-4a31-4b14-a261-66686104ff1d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to