If the set itself is unevaluated as a product, then it should print that way.
The main concern with evaluating such sets automatically would be that they can get quite large compared to the size of the original sets. Aaron Meurer On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Amit Saha <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Sergey Kirpichev <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:18:41 PM UTC+4, Amit Saha wrote: >>> >>> IMO, a product set is a set (at least Wikipedia tells me so). So, >>> shouldn't it rather be the following? >>> >>> {(1,2), (1,3), (2,2), (2,3)} >> >> >> 1) It *is* a set: >> In [8]: isinstance(p, Set) >> Out[8]: True > > Yes, I realized that. My comment is regarding how it is presented to the user. > > > > -- > http://echorand.me > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CANODV3kUJ%2B_a_tOCpTtRiYLqfoXC6z274aqMYEG5SuypRD-cVQ%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6JGdy9sHe97bkh8aW6-Co3xkUADnTbTspprW31ZLoiydw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
