Am 24.04.2014 01:29, schrieb Ondřej Čertík:
the goal
of csympy is the absolute best performance, that we can get, for the *real*
problems that people are solving, like PyDy.
I'm at odds with absolute goals like that.
They're good for proof of concept code. It's good to know how far some
envelope can be pushed.
However, once code gets productive, other factors come like (among
others) maintainability, redundancy, testability etc. come into play.
Normally you'll have to strike a trade-off of some kind and what you'll
get is specifically *not* "absolute best performance". Hey, as long as
you aren't coding in assembly, you're not going to get the absolute
bests performance anyway, there will always be some 10% or 20% you don't
get - trying to get the maximum out of C++ isn't actually that
interesting, and the art is to see the diminishing returns and know when
to stop.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/53589C71.1040509%40durchholz.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
