Here is some work on the pow issue: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7519

Looks like it was merged so the ccode printer should print x*x*x... for
less that 10 x's.


Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Jason Moore <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> Jason
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:38 AM, James Crist <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I was planning on going to bed, but ended up working on this instead. I
>> have no self control...
>>
>> Anyway, I've uncovered some things:
>>
>> 1. Addition of the restrict keyword to tell the compiler we're not
>> aliasing offers marginal gains. Gain a couple microseconds here and there.
>> This requires a c99 compiler, but it's 2014, everyone should have one by
>> now.
>>
>> 2. Inlining the function call resulted in smaller gains than 1, but still
>> *slightly* measurable. I suspect that for larger expression sizes this will
>> be negligible to none.
>>
>> 3. Here's the big one: For small powers, pow(c, n) is considerably slower
>> than c*c*c*c... Changing the ccode Pow handler to print all pows less than
>> 5 (arbitrary number) out as multiplication I was able to match/beat
>> (slightly) all of jason's benchmarks with the C + numpy ufuncs.
>>
>
> Oh yes! I knew that. In fact, I feel like I read in the current code
> somewhere. I forget, but that seems like a standard way we should be
> handling pows in C. Nice find!
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:38:30 PM UTC-5, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>
>>> On why Fortran is faster, Fortran semantics ensure that function
>>> arguments never alias, this allows the optimizer to make assumptions about
>>> the function and the arguments. This the main advantage of Fortran over C.
>>> But, because of this, it can lead to more memory usage. I know that the
>>> newer C++ standards have a keyword to mark arguments to indicate that they
>>> won't be aliased, but that requires that the code generator and the
>>> compiler support them.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tim.
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-28, at 2:17 PM, Jason Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Jim and others,
>>> >
>>> > Here are the benchmarks I made yesterday:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.moorepants.info/blog/fast-matrix-eval.html
>>> >
>>> > The working code is here: https://gist.github.com/moorepants/
>>> 6ef8ab450252789a1411
>>> >
>>> > Any feedback is welcome.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Jason
>>> > moorepants.info
>>> > +01 530-601-9791
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:44 PM, James Crist <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I was wondering about that. I wasn't sure if the overhead from looping
>>> through the inputs multiple times would outweigh improvements from fast C
>>> loops. Glad that in your case it does.
>>> >
>>> > I've thrown a WIP PR up: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7929
>>> >
>>> > For some reason, creating the functions in python with numpy calls
>>> still seems to be faster (for micro-benchmarks). This probably has
>>> something to do with function complexity (the example function above is
>>> simple), but I'd still think it'd be faster in pure C. I tried inlining the
>>> call, which was a small improvement, but it was still slower than the pure
>>> numpy-python version. Something to look into.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Jason Moore <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Yeh, but if you simply create a ufunc for each expression in a matrix
>>> you still get substantial speedups. I wrote a bunch of test cases that I'll
>>> post to my blog tomorrow.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Jason
>>> > moorepants.info
>>> > +01 530-601-9791
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:26 PM, James Crist <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Not yet. I wrote it this morning during an extremely boring meeting,
>>> and haven't had a chance to clean it up. This doesn't solve your problem
>>> about broadcasting a matrix calculation though...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Jason Moore <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Awesome. I was working on this today but it looks like you've by
>>> passed what I had working. Do you have a PR with this?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Jason
>>> > moorepants.info
>>> > +01 530-601-9791
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Matthew Rocklin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Cool
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:07 PM, James Crist <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I still need to do some cleanups and add tests, but I finally have
>>> this working and thought I'd share. I'm really happy with this:
>>> >
>>> > In [1]: from sympy import *
>>> >
>>> > In [2]: a, b, c = symbols('a, b, c')
>>> >
>>> > In [3]: expr = (sin(a) + sqrt(b)*c**2)/2
>>> >
>>> > In [4]: from sympy.utilities.autowrap import ufuncify
>>> >
>>> > In [5]: func = ufuncify((a, b, c), expr)
>>> >
>>> > In [6]: func(1, 2, 3)
>>> > Out[6]: 6.7846965230828769
>>> >
>>> > In [7]: func([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [6, 7, 8, 9, 10], 3)
>>> > Out[7]: array([ 11.44343933,  12.36052961,  12.79848207,  13.12159875,
>>>  13.75078733])
>>> >
>>> > In [8]: from numpy import arange
>>> >
>>> > In [9]: a = arange(10).reshape((2, 5))
>>> >
>>> > In [10]: c = arange(10, 20).reshape((2, 5))
>>> >
>>> > In [11]: b = 25
>>> >
>>> > In [12]: func(a, b, c)
>>> > Out[12]:
>>> > array([[ 250.        ,  302.92073549,  360.45464871,  422.57056   ,
>>> >          489.62159875],
>>> >        [ 562.02053786,  639.86029225,  722.8284933 ,  810.49467912,
>>> >          902.70605924]])
>>> >
>>> > In [13]: type(func)
>>> > Out[13]: numpy.ufunc
>>> >
>>> > This now does everything a numpy `ufunc` does normally, as it *is* a
>>> ufunc. Codegen is hooked up to numpy api. Type conversion and broadcasting
>>> are done automagically.
>>> >
>>> > Caveats: only functions with a single output are accepted (this could
>>> be changed to accept multi-output without much effort though). Also, as
>>> with all unfuncs, input/outputs must all be scalars (no matrix/Indexed
>>> operations allowed).
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/76e0fbbe-5ce4-43b7-855b-6ac821f6b8ae%40googlegroups.com.
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAJ8oX-EHZXbd5aFFNRy7gJ0hcydpAsG2qxv7
>>> Py65DQ9cA9VUUA%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> topic/sympy/azVZHLOv9Vc/unsubscribe.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> >
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAP7f1AieaeoOFtc_S4XPxWOX2jr2zmda9VCRpWpzHMTGLk
>>> mHPQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAJ2L7mfL_xO%3DO-ZRMx-zfpZzJKJ-%2BUdTzSCz5jYf%
>>> 2B%3DdovR%2B_7Q%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> topic/sympy/azVZHLOv9Vc/unsubscribe.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAP7f1AjcHrsopXjwK5uYdALeSrokxLMwA7xebTikHyhwL-%2BOVg%
>>> 40mail.gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAJ2L7me73iJmkWm%3D_LiyWrsuOCZm%2B4OZbqD%
>>> 2BkwwScWWx23HVdg%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/sympy/CAP7f1Agdi_X-o0B%2B9mH2CGOSN-TyYGVwgZm4q8%
>>> 3DYwxieBzZkzA%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sympy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/6cfe63df-df00-4c36-a88a-6c477becc924%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/6cfe63df-df00-4c36-a88a-6c477becc924%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAP7f1AhLxStbNfWFUJ8S7FeJ9TFZiC%3DM1VAamxLokZNmpG62Rg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to