Am 15.01.2015 um 14:44 schrieb [email protected]:
Hi everyone,
yes, I want to include my code into sympy. But not now.
Before a possible inclusion, I would like to improve the coding-style, and
add a sufficient exception handling.
Sounds reasonable.
Personally, I think it would be reasonable to add proper caveats to the
docstrings and include the code anyway. It gives the code more
visibility, so other contributors might be interested in doing these
improvements.
I'm not sure what policy the SymPy project as a whole in these matters
has, it may well be that Aaron or Ondrej disagree.
However, at any rate, define an "imperfection tolerance" at which you're
willing to have the code included. If you want to deliver something
that's 100% perfect, you'll hone it for the rest of your life and it
won't get ever included, because there's *always* "one other thing to
improve".
(Not having any knowledge of group theory, I can't comment on what
features might or might not be desirable.)
Becaues I'm still a (physics-) student, I'm also thinking on an application
for the GSoC 2015, would this be a good idea?
Definitely.
Regard,
Jo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/54B7CCA1.5040907%40durchholz.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
