Hi Aaron

>I don't remember if I mentioned this earlier, but for Abelian groups, we
should try to reuse as much of the stuff from the AGCA module as possible.
It already implements a lot of what you are suggesting for modules, and
since Abelian groups are just Z-modules

I completely agree.

> Perhaps we should structure the classes along the definition of a module
that a module is a ring and an Abelian group, IMHO, Abelian groups are
better thought of in terms of module theory than group theory, but it would
be nice to have a group theory interface on top of Z-modules.

I am not quite sure about this. I might be completely wrong, but just my
two cents: Module theory is more about ring action like group actions
rather than the group itself, like vector spaces for fields. So by
definition even though ring action over an abelian group is a module ( If
that is what you meant by "Ring and abelian group"), I think we should
better not use this as a subclass structure because they are fundamentally
different. And moreover I feel Module theory should be left aside to study
ring actions extensively, while being able to have their representations in
group theory as well. Like you said Z-modules can inherit a lot from
AbelianGroups while still being a part of module theory. Again I have
little knowledge of ring theory so clarify me if I am wrong. what do you
think ?

> so that the Z-module representation is just an extension of the Abelian
group representation (rather than the other way around).
Yes.

> Take a look at the AGCA stuff and see what you think.
It looks a lot like what I had in mind. Though I din't read every line of
it, I am sure it would be a lot helpful for me and will focus more when I
start implementing.

I have few doubts,

What do you think so far ?
Are there any areas in group theory where sympy would like to focus ?

Thanks,
kaushik

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't remember if I mentioned this earlier, but for Abelian groups, we
> should try to reuse as much of the stuff from the AGCA module as possible.
> It already implements a lot of what you are suggesting for modules, and
> since Abelian groups are just Z-modules. IMHO, Abelian groups are better
> thought of in terms of module theory than group theory, but it would be
> nice to have a group theory interface on top of Z-modules.
>
> Perhaps we should structure the classes along the definition of a module
> that a module is a ring and an Abelian group, so that the Z-module
> representation is just an extension of the Abelian group representation
> (rather than the other way around). Take a look at the AGCA stuff and see
> what you think.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joachim Durchholz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 31.01.2015 um 00:01 schrieb vamsi kaushik:
>>
>>> Hi Aaron,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the interest. I had actually created a rough draft of my
>>> proposal. But I am very doubtful it has the minute implementation
>>> details.
>>> However I had outlined my idea very briefly in the wiki here
>>> <https://github.com/kaushik94/Proposal/wiki>.
>>>
>>
>> That looks like a lot of thought and code reading went into it, which is
>> great.
>>
>> What's the reasoning behind not subclassing from magma/semi-group?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jo
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sympy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>> msgid/sympy/54CD54F9.5060201%40durchholz.org.
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sympy/xH18C-g-ySQ/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6KfH6Bw%3D2yfS6R1iBjHeXC10On_Uk4gr6sNBqyiWDM6Bw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6KfH6Bw%3D2yfS6R1iBjHeXC10On_Uk4gr6sNBqyiWDM6Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAK61vZooxm6N%2BmNaUCeRKoDkziCYw%3D3At_FGH6MCwd2spjze%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to