The main design difference with the new assumptions is that the assumptions are stored separate from the expressions, like Q.positive(x). I would not recommend using them unless you know what you are doing, though, because currently almost nothing in SymPy actually looks at them.
Aaron Meurer On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Amit Saha <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > From a sympy user's perspective, which is the "getting started" > document for the current assumptions implementation? Couple of things > I am looking for: > > - When I create a Symbol object, what is the default list of > assumptions about it? How do I find it? > - What are all the possible assumptions for a Symbol? > > I think there is a "new" assumptions implementation in the works - > what are the main changes that are going to happen? > > > Thanks and apologies if I missed to look at the right places. > > Best, > Amit. > > > -- > http://echorand.me > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CANODV3ndZcv6sVnttbiJzYBKg7T%2BxX2GYS90buwsbPC92%3DoCSw%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6%2BcS_AXa_rn094XR9cyXNT_s8z1zBz0eHw9fOrMRTuQnA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
