Thanks Jim! That all sounds great to me and seems like a major improvement.
Rock and Roll!


Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:40 PM, James Crist <[email protected]> wrote:

> As of this writing, SymPy has 1648 issues open. That's more than numpy,
> scipy, or pandas (more than numpy and scipy combined!). Further, our issue
> tagging system is a mess. We can do better than this!
>
> Many of these issues are imported from google code, and may be already
> fixed in master (some as old as 2008). Others may be duplicates. I've taken
> it upon myself to start cleaning these up. Here's the system I'm using:
>
> *Issue label breakdown:*
>
> *Submodule tags (html #0000FF, blue):*
> Everything after `sympy.` for the specific submodule. Keep the naming and
> casing consistent with the sympy namespace. If the relevant submodule is
> small, group it in with it's parent submodule. Feel free to create new
> labels if needed. Multiple tags may be used, but only if needed.
>
> *Classifier tags (html #d4c5f9, light purple):*
> What kind of issue is this. Currently 3 supported:
> - `valid`: valid bug *in current master* (will be renamed to bug later,
> see below)
> - `wontfix`: not a bug, should be tagged and closed (once everyone
> agrees/explanation given of course!)
> - `duplicate`: same issue already exists. Main issue should be linked, and
> the duplicate closed.
> - `enhancement`: not a bug, but something that would be nice to have
>
> *Platform tags (html #800080, purple):*
> Things that have to deal with specific platforms, python versions. This
> includes `IPython`, `Python 3`, other versions such as `PyPy`, etc...,
> `Windows`, and `SymPy Gamma`/`SymPy Live`. I feel like the last 2 should be
> moved to their respective repositorys, but I don't know how to export
> issues (it may not even be possible). I'd like to consolidate these if
> possible, but current system isn't terrible.
>
> *Priority tags (html #eb6420, orangeish?):*
> How important this is to sympy. I don't like these, as almost everything
> is marked as medium. I feel they don't provide a level of information that
> we actually care about, and a better triaging system could be used. Mainly,
> priority is relative - what's important to some users may be irrelevant to
> others. Really, only the `critical` tag has been used to some success. But,
> as we were using them before, let's keep them for now.
>
> *Meta tags (html #c7def8, sky blue):*
> Issues that have to deal with non-code functionality. Testing and
> documentation tags are obvious, `Maintainability` has to do with how we
> organize code/code quality/dev environment issues.
>
> *Special tags (html #f7c6c7, pink):*
> Things that need their own issue and need to stand out. Right now this is
> deprecation warning removal issues, as they're important and should be
> easily visible, and `Needs decision` labels.
>
> *Difficulty tags (html #009800, green):*
> How hard is this task? Currently only "easy to fix". I'd like to get a
> better breakdown, such as what Pandas has. See below for more info
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You may notice that leaves many tags in our current labeling system
> unused. That's because I'd like to get rid of them, but only once they're
> retagged. Too many different labels makes the whole system hard to
> navigate, too few and we can't find what we're looking for. I believe the
> above is a good proposed start.
>
> *How can you help???*
> If you want to help out with the effort, here's what I need:
>
> - Brief discussion on labeling system. I will not accept a bikeshed on
> this, so discussion should be kept brief. Anything is better than what we
> had before, we don't need to decide on the *end all* labelling system.
> Really, all I want is to know if others think the Priority labels are
> useful (I don't), and also how people would feel about labels for effort
> and difficulty levels, such as what Pandas does
> <https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues>.
>
> - Help labeling. I've already started at the end of our issue list, and
> have been making my way forward. The methodology:
>
>
>    1. Determine if the issue is still valid in master. If not, close it.
>    2. Tag issue with classifier tags (`enhancement`, `valid`,
>    `duplicate`, or `wontfix`)
>    3. If relevant, tag issue with submodule tag. Create new one if no
>    good match exists.
>    4. If relevant, tag issue with platform tag. Create new one if no good
>    match exists
>    5. If relevant, tag issue with meta tag.
>    6. Difficulty, priority, and special (really just `Needs decision`)
>    tags are super optional. If we can agree to tag difficulty in some tiered
>    system, then this should be done as well, but I'm not going to enforce
>    this. Same for priority. SymPy is big - not everyone is going to know
>    what's important or difficult. Further, what's important to me, may be
>    irrelevant to others.
>
>
> Once all issues have been gone through, the `bug` and `wrong result`
> issues should be deleted, and `valid` renamed to `bug`.
>
> To work together on this, just start at the back, and work forward. Most
> issues have no tags, so it should be reasonably easy to see what hasn't
> been touched by others yet.
>
> *The goal:*
> - All issues are tagged
> - Many of the issues are found to be already fixed/duplicates and can be
> closed
>
> GSoC starts in a month - it'd be really nice to get our issue tracker
> cleaned up for the big push through the summer. I'm sure we can do it!
>
> - Jim
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/6b60659e-15ff-47ee-8e0c-a2cb53810340%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/6b60659e-15ff-47ee-8e0c-a2cb53810340%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAP7f1Aiseb5goqVD933KVENtyNTD8J3J0EVdVH%3DSycp7WefkQg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to